SCIENCE under construction

In the past six years I might have done more for physics, medicine, chemistry and economics than anybody else in the World. However, I do not count on you to reward my past. I ask you to acknowledge my power to continue to discover. (I have seen what nobody else have seen before and I have made more steps into the unknown than any other human being...)

Likely, most of my theories are wrong... Otherwise, I will be the greatest scientist that has ever lived... :) :) :)

As you can see below, I have made steps ahead in many directions. However, I know that, for some of these directions, if I make just one more step ahead, it will be a revolution for science...

As my life is going today, I might have only a few hours of high level thinking left. You can turn that into thousands of hours.

There are many ideas that I have not made public yet (maybe the most important is the one about gravity and inertia which can help humans to create rockets moving at speeds thousands of times faster than today...)

You can even test me, if you want: It is likely that, from any information that you will give me, I will create some information that has never been created before (in the entire history of mankind). And you know how difficult that is (when you want to discover / invent something, you are competing with one hundred billion people [every human that has ever lived])...

Here are some of my scientific ideas, from the essence of matter, when I wrote about a new property of matter (a very difficult concept, which is also addressing the essence of life, extending it further into the organic matter and, possible, into the inorganic matter...) and the essence of energy, toward medicine, chemistry, economics, mathematics and beyond:

FASTER THAN LIGHT - EXISTING IN TWO PLACES AT THE SAME TIME

You can say that any object moving faster than light might be perceived as existing in several places, at the same time...

Forget about Einstein's postulate... Look at the stars... If you see two identical objects moving "synchronized", you might have spotted an object moving faster than light...

For one object moving faster than light, you see two identical objects at 2d(cv -v**2 cosA)/(v**2-c**2) of each other [A has to be bigger than 90 degrees ... when A is 180 degrees, the solution is just theoretical (practically you will never see the object) ... any object moving, toward us, faster than light, cannot be seen (black hole?)...].

Some quantum objects might just confirming my theory (because of the fact that they are moving faster than light, they are perceived as existing in two places at the same time).

What I learned from Einstein's success: that a theory doesn't have to be absolutely correct in order to advance mankind's knowledge... Moreover, no theory can be absolutely true (it is impossible for humans to completely understand the Universe)...

THE RELATIVITY OF MATTER

Where light is showing us matter we can find particles which show us empty space... In general, every piece of matter that we will find will be seen as empty space by some particle that we will use... You can say that matter is created by the particle that you use...

What we see as matter is empty space for other entities... (and, of course, what we see as empty space is matter for other entities...)...

You can say that matter does not have an absolute existence... You create the matter that you see... You create the matter that you touch... The matter that you see/touch does not exist without you...

The Universe might be a continuous entity. The light and our feeling of touch has tricked us to assume a discontinuity...

The fact that some part of an entity (a part which we call matter) is interacting with light is not a reason to see a significant discontinuity...

Based on this theory (relativity of matter), I have to say that what has been defined/imagined as antimatter is not completely true: any combination of matter and antimatter will result in some matter that we will not be able to detect (matter will not just "disappear").

Also, antimatter has been defined as a result of the combination of two types of matter. This is a particular case, where the detection of matter/antimatter is done with the same type of matter (you have only two types of matter that you call "matter" and "antimatter"). The general case involves three types of matter: when you combine two of those types of matter, the third one will not be able to detect the result of that combination... However, I have to repeat, the result of that combination is also a type of matter...

Some other interesting possibilities (in the following sentences, aMi is antimatter for matter Mi) :

M1 + aM1 = M2, where M1 + M2 = M1 + M2 (there is no interaction between M1 and M2 [M1 is "empty space" for M2 and M2 is "empty space" for M1])

M1 + aM12 = M3 (for some type of matter there are several types of antimatter), where M1 + M2 + M3 = M1 + M2 + M3 and aM1 + aM12 = aM1 + aM12

M1 + aM13 = M2 (two types of antimatter can be the basis for the result of the same type of matter), where aM1 + aM13 = aM1 + aM13

M2 + aM2 = M1 (there is antimatter which can reverse the "disappearance" of matter), where aM1 + aM2 = aM1 + aM2

There is a strong possibility that light is not created by the matter that we see... Light seems to be created by the matter that we do not see (light seems to be created by the "empty space" matter which is around the matter previously believed to be generating the light)... Light is likely to be the result of some matter reaching a state where it is interacting with the "empty space" matter... On this model you can see how the speed of light is independent of the speed of the "bulb" because it is not produced by the matter which is moving ("bulb"), it is produced by the matter which is at rest ("empty space" matter)... Also, this model is showing that, at the same time that we induce the "empty space" matter to produce light, we also induce a much faster propagation of particles that we do not see and which are creating the phenomenon called quantum entanglement... It is likely that this kind of very fast particles also exist in the matter that we see (the matter that we are...) ... "Quantum entanglement" might be possible to be discovered for the electrons that are moved inside wires by a direct current...

If light is created by the matter that is not able to detect it, I have to find in our Universe the matter that is creating light for other "Universe/matter"... The only strange stuff that I see in our Universe are black holes... And they look such a fit to create light for the matter in another Universe ... Therefore, black holes might be places in our Universe where there are stars in other Universe (I called "other Universe" some matter that we cannot detect)...

A star made from the matter that we are might generate a black hole for some matter that we cannot detect (for some matter that does not exist for us) and a star made from some matter that we cannot detect (from some matter that does not exist for us) might generate black holes for the matter that we are...

In a less precise language, where our Universe has stars another Universe has black holes and where our Universe has black holes, other Universe has stars...Black holes and stars are connections between Universes...

Moreover, whenever/wherever we create light, we create black holes in another Universe... Whenever/wherever some other entities (in another Universe) are creating light they also create black holes in our Universe...

Black holes might turn matter from an Universe into light in another Universe...

If it is true, we will be able to communicate with other Universe (with some matter that we are not able to detect = matter that does not exist for us)...

NEW PROPERTIES FOR MATTER - EXTENDING THE DEFINITION OF LIFE

These properties are very difficult to explain...

Neurons have a perception of the state of their own existence - it looks like the word "feeling" will give the best sense to this idea - neurons have feelings; some neurons feel what we know to be colors, other neurons feel what we know to be sounds ... you can say that there are neurons which feel blue, other feel red, other feel green ... Just look at an object ... try to get it close to your eyes so you can see only one color, nothing else ... then (imagine) try to block everything else (sounds, thoughts ...) you will then understand what some neuron is feeling... This will be the simplest way to comprehend this property of the matter ... As you exist, this is how that red color exists (it knows nothing else... it feels nothing else... However, at some level, it is not much different than you and me...)

I defined hearing, vision, touch, smell, and taste as being properties of matter (neurons). I stated that it is likely that these types of properties are present in the entire organic matter and even for the inorganic matter.

Finding if similar properties exists for other types of matter (outside the brain) and extending the definition of life to include any matter which has properties similar to hearing, vision, touch, smell, taste is a very difficult task... Maybe impossible...

This is the huge difference between the objects that we build and living organisms: everything we create is designed to serve us... for example, a camera can decode the information received from the light in a similar manner as we do, but the images created by the camera are for us to see... the camera has no perception of those images - it is not built from pieces which have a visual feeling...

Several neurons together can create a new entity, which feels the combined feelings of all those neurons... For example, think about your visual entity... you can imagine it like a jigsaw puzzle made from millions of pieces; every piece knows (feels) what it is painted on it (the paint is actually a state of that piece's existence; if, for example, one piece has just one color - blue - on it and if that piece can see and talk, when it will see something blue, it will say: "That's me"); imagine that all the pieces of the puzzle are put in proper place (the puzzle is solved) and the final image is that of Einstein; can you imagine now that there is an entity, made by all the pieces of the puzzle, and that entity feels like the image of Einstein? (If that entity would be able to see and to speak, then, when it will see Einstein, it will say: "That's me").

HOW WE THINK - OUR FINITE UNIVERSE

At the core of our thinking process is error (memory error). Learning to think, for humans, is learning to create and control memory errors.

Thinking is the ability of some (all?) neurons to detect and to assign value to neuronal paths. Detecting and assigning value for neuronal paths is just a simple physiological/chemical process.

As I defined memory to be present in every part of the brain, in the same way I see thinking present everywhere in the brain. We can think with every lobe of our brains (visual thinking, emotional thinking...) Even the part of the brain which is moving our hands can think (solve problems) - this might be what we call "dexterity"...

If I consider that the brain has 100 billion neurons and each neuron has one thousand connections ... I will be able calculate all the possible thoughts a brain is capable to create ... That will be our Universe ... Anything beyond that cannot exist for mankind ...

Actually, "thought" is just too broad... I can be more specific and say that the brain's existence can be constructed "frame by frame"... Every fraction of a second, a brain has a state of existence (sees some images, hears some sound...)... All those frames can be known (saved in some way)... Then, you will just have to "assemble" all the possible "movies" and you will get mankind's Universe... Today, we are capable of doing this for some very small brains (at best, for insects...)... However, some extraterrestrial entities might be capable of doing it for people... The day when we will become a machine (a finite state device)...

It is logical to ask if some animal / entity can have a part of his "Universe" that will not be part of our Universe (something that we cannot imagine... we cannot even think about it...)... The answer is: yes! Even the devices that we build can have states of existence that are out of our Universe!...

If I write that about the human brain, I can also address artificial intelligence: no matter how complex it looks, it just a finite state device... There is a danger, but it is not what we think... The danger is coming from the properties of matter that I described... The danger is in what we do not know about matter and about life...

AN EVOLVED DARWINIAN THEORY

For millions of years, cells, viruses, bacterias and other similar entities have survived... We know how cells survived and evolved... You have to wonder if the viruses existent today have existed for millions of years = If there is a natural mechanism which is creating viruses, bacterias and other similar entities (artificial viruses have already been made)... = If the mechanism which happened millions of years ago (the creation of the first cells, viruses...) is happening again and again... Beware that this kind of mechanism is capable of creating viruses strong enough to kill all the humans, all the animals, all the cells existent in the World !...

I can write now about a different "tree of life" (an evolved Darwinian theory): you have to imagine several trees... some which are only in the ground (seeds), some just made it out of the ground and some which are fully grown... For every cell, insect, animal that you discover, you have to know to which tree it belongs... And you can imagine that, millions of years from now, at the top of some trees we will not find humans...

And for Darwin's tree...: If Darwin's theory of evolution is true, then intermediary species should appear again and again... if there has been an evolution "path" A, B, C, D, and only species A and D exist today, then species B and C should appear again...

THE ESSENCE OF TIME

It looks like cells are measuring the time based on some kind of a "feeding cycle"... If you change the "feeding cycle" the cell will live a longer or a shorter life... Therefore, the length of your life is likely to be proportional with the average length of the cell's "feeding cycle", Y = n * C You can see that increasing C will increase your life... How can you do that? Basically, eat less! However, be careful ! It has to be done in the right way!

Now, the funny part, telling physics that the main root for time is based on the cell's "feeding cycle"... And the really funny part (for me): it is a million times more likely that relativity of time is to be confirmed on the cell's "feeding cycle" than on Einstein's theories (one day, people will get to travel with speeds close to the speed of light, but nobody will see that he counted a different time than the people on Earth = nobody will get older at a lower rate than the people on Earth just because he will travel at a speed close to the speed of light)...

From another perspective, time is a creation of the brain. A feeling of time is similar to a feeling of space - you can say that any neuronal entity has a feeling of order (space or time). Time, for the brain, is like a virtual space - a place used to put memories in order. The three-dimensional characteristic of this feeling allows us to have parallel lines of time (we can understand that several events can happen at the same time; we can cross form one time line to another - for example, you can do the following action in your memory: connect the time line of your own activity with the time line for the news that you memorized ... like this ... while I was... Germany won the World Cup ...). We can see now how space and time converge in the brain (Einstein got to be so lucky: giving light an absolute status, he created a model of the World where time and space are dependent on velocity)...

THERMODYNAMICS... STATING AN EXCEPTION TO THE PRINCIPLES OF THERMODYNAMICS

Absolute zero has to be specific to every type of atom (a specific value for oxygen, another value for iron...)... An atom will reach the state of absolute zero when it will not exchange energy with any colder atoms... Two atoms which exchange energy with each other, but not with a third one... the latter is in a state of absolute zero...

For any atom, the potential energy existent in that atom is K*(T-Tx), where Tx is the absolute zero temperature for that type of atom... Any action (fission, fusion or anything else) which is able to increase Tx will generate energy...

The existing models in thermodynamics are talking about heat and work as distinct forms of energy... I believe that is a mistake... When you want some work to be done, you get a coordinated move of most electrons toward the desired direction(s)... When you need heat, you just want to move as many electrons from the surrounding air... call it "heat", when it is moving the electrons of our own bodies and call it "work" when it is moving some other electrons...

Even electric energy is also based on movement of electrons, thus is a part of the same type of energy as heat and work... in the case of electricity, the electrons have a better coordinated movement (more restricted)... It might look strange, but even what it is called "nuclear energy" is also based on movement of electrons... for nuclear energy, the electrons are those which are moving dramatically after the small movement of protons and neutrons... to get a formula for the energy "stored" in any object, find out what kind of transformation will get the most displacement for the electrons E=nde, taking into account the numbers of electrons, the change of distance between the electrons and the nucleus...

Somehow, I get now into some kind of blurred distinction between matter and energy... We might not have both... Just imagine you have small pieces of matter which are moving continuously, some faster and some slower, in a circular path... If you choose the pieces carefully and put them together in the right order you can get objects which will move in any direction you want... Until today, I have never known that I can walk because I am able to coordinate the movement of billions of electrons...

We are built like some "standby" machines: electrons are moving continuously (keeping what we know to be our body temperature)... the main reason of our body's temperature might be to offer us the possibility to make movements in a fraction of a second...

ELEMENTS - PERIODIC TABLE

Today, I will make science a lot more complicated... Starting today, you will have to see the periodic table as an approximation (the complete periodic table is hundreds of times bigger)... For every element, as it is defined today, we will be able to discover several distinct types of atoms... (not all the atoms that we recognize today as belonging to the same element are looking exactly alike...)... The difference is in the three dimensional structure of the nucleus...

If you want to create super-heavy elements (119 protons or even higher) and to stabilize them, you have to decrease the temperature (as you will lower the temperature, the number of protons that you will be able to put in an atom will get higher...)... Those super-heavy elements already exist on other planets...

GRAVITY

It is likely that the gravitational force is dependent on temperature G = f (M1,M2,R,T1,T2)

Also, Gravitational fields are likely to have a point of discontinuity... [the intensity of the field, g(R), is continuous until a Rmax, where g(Rmax)=0] ...

This discontinuity might be the proof that any field is based on an interaction of particles...

The size of the discontinuity is revealing the size of the particles... We are now in a place where we have never been before We move, with the Earth, at thousands miles per hour, around the center of the Milky Way... It will take billions of years for the Earth to be in this place again (in the Universe)... It is very likely that the Earth is now in a place (in the Universe) where it has never been before... It is likely that there is there a rotation center at a larger scale than our galaxy... (The entire Milky Way is moving around a center located outside it...)

THERE ARE SEVERAL TYPES OF HUMANS Our brains might be wired to have several dominant areas... Therefore, there might be several types of humans: with dominant speech in the left, dominant visual in the right, dominant parietal in the left... you will get several types of this kind of combinations... In other words, for every piece of your brain which is dominant, you have the corresponding symmetrical one, which is not dominant... and not all the dominants are on the same side...

THE THREE-DIMENSIONAL FEELING / VISION

When something touches your body, you immediately know the exact location of the part of your body that was touched. For example, touch the top of your left index finger with right index finger. You will say that you felt a touch on your left index finger. However, you know that all your perceptions (feelings) are created in your brain. Now you can understand that there are some neurons in your brain that feel like they are on the top of your left finger. This type of feeling is a little more difficult to understand than a feeling of color or a feeling of sound... There are neurons (in your brain) which (when excited) feel that they are on your feet, other neurons feel they are on your hands, other feel they are on your nose... Let's go further and think about our visual feeling... We see a three-dimensional world... All the space that you see in front of you is the feeling of some neurons... That space in front of you is like another part of your body... A person who lost a limb will understand this easier: he has some kind of perception of the space where his limb was... Millions of neurons feel like they are in the space that you see in front of you. If you will assign a Cartesian system of reference for that space, there will be a neuron which feels he is at position (0,5,0), another neuron feels he is at position (9,6,7)... How big is this visual space? How can we measure it? An unit of measure should be the smallest spatial perception we can get (this will go to the visual acuity - easier than a neuron-size unit). Can it be that the neurons, which are excited when I look at the moon, feel millions of units away from the neurons which are excited when I look at some stars? The answer is no, and this will be one clue for many of the limitations we have discovered about our vision (how much do we have to deform the world to make it fit into our small visual space?). The three-dimensional feeling is adjusted (calibrated) every day: when you look and touch a part of your body, neurons from the visual entity have to get the same feeling as neurons from the somatosensory entity. The first big calibration happens after birth; then, as the body grows, the perception of the size of the objects around the body is changing. Hand-eye coordination is another type of calibration, which works in a similar way: you learn to see the objects where you feel the objects... You can say that better hand-eye coordination is based on a better visual feeling...

BINOCULAR VISION

There are several perceptions to be learned by visual entities; one part of the learning is specific to binocular vision. A visual entity with a binocular source of information has a visual feeling as the superimposed visual feelings triggered by the left eye and by the right eye. There is no "computation" made in the brain (no creation of an image from two other images - no middle image created from a left image and a right image). Nothing is "fused" - any part of the visual feeling belongs to the left visual feeling or to the right visual feeling (it is not a new feeling). The brain does not have such a "processing power" - to create a three-dimensional color image (GB of information), from two other similar images, in a fraction of a second (as fast as you can open your eyes). To understand how the visual feelings are superimposed, you should perform some experiments. First, you have to determine which your dominant eye is. There are several methods to do that - one is the Dolman method: take a piece of paper and cut a small opening in the center; with both eyes open, look through that opening and move it until you find an object that is small enough to fit in the opening; close your left eye; if you still see that object, your right eye is the dominant one; if not, your left eye is the dominant one. Extend one hand and try to cover a part of the image of several objects in front of you. Close your non-dominant eye. Try to notice every change that will happen when you open the eye. You will see that nothing is erased or altered to the image that you see with your dominant eye; all the change is some kind of addition - this is how a visual feeling is superimposed. The left and right visual feelings are completely superimposed; however, what we have learned, in our first months of being alive, was to ignore some visual feelings (from the non-dominant eye). As we learn to ignore, we can learn to see those feelings again. I did it; you can do it too; a warning: it is not a pleasant feeling and it might trigger some visual problems; if you chose to do the following experiments, you will do it at your own risk. Take the piece of paper with the center opening; look again, with both eyes, through the opening; then, close your dominant eye and look through the opening with the other eye; open your dominant eye; if you concentrate, you will be able to see both images at the same time (it will look like two openings - with two different objects...). You just learned to see all visual feelings again. Now, you can choose to go further, to a more challenging experiment, which will involve the concept of parallax. Take three objects, of similar size, and arrange the objects at 10 - 20 feet in front of you, one of the objects to be in front of the others; try to arrange the objects in such way that, when you close one eye, you cannot see one object (because of the object in front of it), when you close the other eye, you cannot see the other object and, with both eyes open, you see all three objects; take the paper with the center opening; when you look through the opening, as you move it from left to right, you will see only two objects first (one will just "disappear"); if you concentrate, as you move the opening left-right, you will see how another opening will appear, and you will be able to see the "disappeared" object through that new opening. Once again, you learned to see all visual feelings. Now you can try the ultimate test: extend one hand and try to cover the image of several objects in front of you; concentrate and try to see both images of your hand at the same time - you should be able to, if you have been successful in the previous tests; be careful, do not spend too much time looking at both images... As you can learn to see some visual feelings (that you have learned not to see) you can discover something that you did not learn not to see (one of the many illusions created by our visual entities). If you take one object which is less than one inch thick, put it in your extended hand, you will see that you cannot cover any object which is more than 10 feet away from you; it will look like you can see through the object that you have in your hand. The true explanation for this "transparence" is that you get to see two visual feelings superimposed.

TALENT, as we know it, has an unconscious component...

I do not know any completely conscious activity which is recognized as talent... Learning to give up control of muscles to the unconscious parts of the brain is a way of achieving talent... It is most likely to happen in childhood and it is likely to have a genetic component...

STOP EMPATHY "SQUASHING" Do you want your future children to be schizophrenic, autistic or bipolar? If you don't, STOP "SQUASHING" YOUR EMPATHY! (You "succeed" in "squashing" your empathy by modifying your brain... That modification is likely to be passed to your future children...)

WE ARE ALL SCHIZOPHRENIC

If you are healthy, you are schizophrenic only in your sleep... Therefore, schizophrenia can be considered a sleep disorder, when it happens in the awake state, and part of the normal sleep (in the sleep state)...

ANY GROWTH BASED ON A "CELLULAR DIVISION" TYPE OF PROCESS IS LIKELY TO HAVE A FIBONACCI STRUCTURE

Golden ratio of the human growth might be the result of the cell division mechanism... First, there is one cell, then, through division, one old cell and one new cell, then the old cell divides and you have three cells (two are older and one is new), then, again, the old cells divide and you will have three plus two (three are old), then, once more, the three old cells divide and you will have three plus five... This successive division (old cells divide before new cells) generates the Fibonacci structure...

THE FACES THAT WE LIKE TO SEE

Humans, animals... It looks like some scientists have found that there is a correspondence between the shape of the body/face and the brain (you can predict how a person's / animal's brain is working based on the shape of the face/body)... One side of the mechanism might work like this: we learn, unconsciously, to make correlations between faces and characters/behaviors... Unfortunately, there are people which trigger errors of such recognition (their face is misleading) and the result is suffering (some of them suffer, other make other people suffer)... The other side of the mechanism has been started to be discovered...

EXTENDING / MOVING YOUR CONSCIOUSNESS THROUGH YOUR BRAIN AND BODY

You can learn to extend / move your consciousness through your brain and body... Some of this movements can help you solve some problems faster / better (for example, moving your consciousness toward the occipital will increase your ability of three-dimensional processing of information...). If there is any truth in the idea of increasing your brain usage beyond 10%, it has to be in the capacity to extend your consciousness. When you move your consciousness, you can experience fascinating feelings... For example, "out of body experiences", "holotropic breathwork" ... are just simple movements of the consciousness into the right side of the brain... I wonder what you feel when you extend your consciousness into the brain stem, hippocampus, cerebellum or if it is possible to reach the body (heart, liver...)... Great artists are able to move/extend their consciousness into parts of the brain which are unreachable for most people. Art (created by great artists) triggers unconscious connections in the brain, for most people.

ATTACHING A "PERSONALITY" TO OBJECTS The brain is not creating just a simple image; it is also attaching a "personality" to every object that we see. It is interesting to investigate why the brain of a child is assigning more "personality" to objects (when compared with adults)...

PAIN The main mechanism used by neurons to account for the amplitude of an input is based on the frequency of activation. Based on the frequency of activation, neurons can reach several states (a finite set, not a continuous domain). At the highest frequency of activation, the state of most (all?) neurons is what we know to be pain. What all of us know is the pain created by the somatosensory neurons; some of us also know pain as it is created by visual, auditory and other neurons. I consider pain to be an error in our design - for example, we do not need excruciating pain to know to take care of the teeth... just a little pain would be enough for me... How is this pain helping us when is so impairing? The brain feels pain - it is triggered by totally different actions that we commonly associate with pain (cutting the brain, punching the brain... will not trigger pain...). It is more concerning that it is not yet known what action triggers the pain in the brain - likely to be that touching some specific neurons in a fast succession (high frequency) triggers the pain.

CONSCIOUS SLEEP, UNCONSCIOUS SLEEP

The main function of the sleep is to reverse a chemical imbalance through an activation of the neurons in a "reversed" (top-down) order...

The duration of activation, during sleep, for every part of the brain, has to be dictated by the activity performed by the person in wake state...

You should be able to "read", from the sleep activity of the brain, how was the wake activity... Sleep fMRI will tell you how much did the person listen... talk... move... even how much sexual activity... :) ...during wake state... "Sleep" memories are created randomly, based on the fact that there is simultaneous activation in several parts of the brain... What we call dream is just a small portion of the sleep, the activation of the neurons which are part our consciousness... I will call dream conscious sleep, to make a distinction from the main part of the sleep process, unconscious sleep... Adult dreams are different from child dreams because most of the reverse (top - down) visual neuronal paths have been already activated for adults...

INNER VOICE Your inner voice is activating a neuronal path which corresponds to a different frequency than your own voice... For a person who has the voice and the inner voice on the same frequency (if there is such an unlucky individual) it is difficult to speak...

ECONOMICS

It does not matter who is paying the taxes. For example, after any change in taxation, if you give it enough time, the economic system will reestablish the same net exchange between individuals (as it was before that change in taxation).

As far as I know, humans say that their work values 200 billion dollars every day... However, humans forget to count valuable work: the work that most people do for themselves and for their family (or similar type of work)... Of course there is also negative work, but I will leave this for another time (I will disregard here negative work)... If I use the same standards that humans use to come up with the 200 billion dollars, it might be that I will get a 400 billion dollars as the value of the useful work done by humans every day (when you want to evaluate work that people do for themselves, you just have to ask how much a person would have to pay for somebody else to do that work...)... Now, if I divide 400 billion to 7 billion, I will get that, on average, a person is doing 57 dollars worth of work every day... I can get better estimation, based on the fact that not all 7 billion are capable of doing useful work (for example, you have to exclude babies...)... So, the average will increase to 70 dollars... probably more... Three billion people get less than 2 dollars a day? What is this showing? One aspect: there is a huge potential for economic change...

I see the World Economy like a huge pot where there are many hot spots and many cold spots... When the temperature will be the same everywhere, life will get a lot better for everybody... However, I am afraid of the fact that we might run out of some resources prior to getting the Economy optimized = mankind might never get to see how beautiful it can be... What we see in the world today is a global economy's wild way of creating a global government. We can avoid a lot of suffering if we respond to the global economy's demand for a global government. We need a powerful and smart global central bank... capable of "printing" the equivalent of 100 trillion dollars, when/if necessary, in a matter of days... making it able to deal with all these trillion dollars bubbles... In a perfect economic system, inflation is not a negative product. Is a normal result of a growing population (higher demand for fixed resources). In a perfect market, there will never be a shortage (the price will grow enough to prevent any shortage...).

A LITTLE MATHEMATICS

All of us have an approximated perception of the World... the best of those approximations are written into mathematics... Our brains have mathematics embedded in their neurological structure. When you learn (create) mathematics, you discover your own brain...

The essence of Pi is the fact that we cannot fully measure the length of any curve line... You cannot use a segment to measure a curve line... The result of measuring any curve line is an irrational number (it has an infinite number of digits)... If the result of measuring a line is a rational (finite) number, that line is not a curve... The fact that you get "the same Pi" for any circle is the result of the fact that, for any radius, you can build the circle with a similar approximation method (when you do not use a compass) [the length of the radius is not significant - you can easily scale the construction]... Moreover, for any curve which can be created based on a scalable construction, a number similar to Pi can be calculated (a number which will show the length of the curve based on the length of some segment used in the construction of that curve)... You will never get the same PI for the measurement of the circumference of the circle (PIc) as for the measurement of the area of that circle (PIac) [and for the area of the sphere (PIas)... and for the volume of the sphere (PIvs)...]. Even if you say that you consider the idealistic case (infinite precision for PI) you will still have to show that there are different PI for the areas and for the volume. Otherwise, you will say that, at infinite, PI becomes a finite number (implicitly, you will say that, at infinite, a circle is made from straight lines...)...

C=2*PIc*R

Ac=PIac*R^2

As=4*PIas*R^2

Vs=(4/3)*PIvs*R^3

PIc>PIac>PIas>PIvs

THE LAW is what the majority of the people know it to be. That is the bottom line for any justice system. Anybody who believes otherwise is just trying to impose fuzzy logic into the justice system and I can prove it. Unfortunately, the implicit conclusion is that any trial where the jury has been pressured to distrust its knowledge of the law has to be declared a mistrial (all the trials where instructions have been given might be at risk)...

You can see the "timestamp" of those ideas (and many other additional ideas) on twitter.com/fhbrain and on facebook.com/fhbrain (there are some limitations on those websites: twitter is forcing users to "compress" the postings into 130 characters and facebook is "hiding" postings - you have to know how to "dig" to find all the stuff).

There are also many ideas which I made public in other ways. And there are many other ideas that I have not made public yet and, without your help, those ideas will never be revealed (I will take them into my grave)...

If there is no failure, there cannot be any success :)

A mind which is eager to find answers is also eager to find hope... That mind has to learn to ignore hope...

Dying is relative... For the one who died, the entire World has died...

We are designed to believe that the most important thing is to be alive. What if the most important part of life is dying?

I've been immortal until the day I was born...

Florin Horicianu

t@wtw.tw h@z1st.com h@fhbrain.com florinny@hotmail.com florinhusa@aim.com

1-718-425-3118 1-917-477-7648 1-718-690-4813

228 Park Ave S, New York, NY 10003

SCIENCE under construction